Search for: "Martin v. Marks"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2019, 3:45 am
At Bloomberg Law (subscription or registration required), Mark Gurman reports that “Apple Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
It is questionable whether Uber has such an option.By Neil Wilkof Photo on left by pan Martin Jebas. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
Martin v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:58 am
Canton v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
This refusal was just the denial of a benefit; no-one was being threatened with jail or fines for using the name—owners of this mark were just not being given access to certain useful remedies against those who would infringe the mark. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 5:27 pm
Martin, 228 F.3d 1 (2000). [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:45 am
The check is marked for “Retainer” . [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
Mark Pearson has analysed new metadata laws which purport to put confidential interviews at risk. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:58 am
Patterson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Though the Court punted in Frank v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation blog, Christina Martin weighs in on Knick v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Even in Chapter Two -- where I unapologetically set out the sophisticated constitutional theory advanced in the postwar era by political scientists/philosophers like Willmoore Kendall, Martin Diamond, and Harry V. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
The interim between James Monroe’s presidency and the Civil War was marked by extreme sectional division over many political issues, including protectionism v. free trade; annexation of new territories (Texas, California, and Oregon); and state nullification of federal law. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am
Court of Appeal’s decision in September 2018 in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:37 am
” Martin J. [read post]
20 May 2019, 5:49 am
Martin Husovec noted in his introduction, “Prof. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
Gear Inc v Hi-Tech Sports plc [1992] FSR 121, Morritt J stated "…it seems to me that 'reason to believe' must involve the concept of knowledge of facts from which a reasonable man [person] would arrive at the relevant belief. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
