Search for: "Matter of A.D"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2019, 7:29 am
In Matter of Michael R v Amanda R, ___AD3d___, 2019 WL 4264401 (1stDept., 2019) the first and only day of trial on the father’s enforcement petition took place on February 2, 2016 before the Support Magistrate. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
Trump shall appear for a videotaped deposition prior to the trial of this matter and provide testimony for the use at trial. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 8:06 am
Milbank Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, 168 A.D.3d 1026 (2019), 93 N.Y.S.3d 353, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed the dismissal of a legal malpractice case based on the precise terms of the engagement letter. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:29 am
Storelli, 101 A.D.3d 1787, 1788, 958 N.Y.S.2d 249 [4th Dept 2012]. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
**** See, also, Matter of Snyder, 132 A.D.2d 905, 907, aff'd 72. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
**** See, also, Matter of Snyder, 132 A.D.2d 905, 907, aff'd 72. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
Lawrence, 151 A.D.3d 1879, 1279 [2017]; Matter of Kessler v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 8:13 pm
Milbank Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, 168 A.D.3d 1026 (2019), 93 N.Y.S.3d 353, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York affirmed the dismissal of a legal malpractice case based on the precise terms of the engagement letter. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:19 pm
” Furthermore, the Court found there was no feasible alternative to the underpinning, and that in cases such as Madison 96 Associated LLC v. 17 East 96th Owners Corp, 121 A.D.3d 605, 608, 995 N.Y.S.2d 553 (1st Dep’t 2014) and Matter of Tory Burch LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The First Department declined to follow the interpretation of the Second Department which held that the ICPC applies to a nonrespondent parent living outside of New York (Matter of Alexus M. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:38 am
Ward, 169 A.D.3d 833 (2d Dep’t 2019), the court considered whether the physical search of a defendant’s cell phone fell within search incident to arrest exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 5:45 pm
The theory is that by starting the matrimonial case, the Plaintiff (Petitioner in family court) elected to litigate the matters in Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:05 pm
Ct. 2013), aff’d, 112 A.D.3d 1379, 976 N.Y.S.2d 921 (2013) (grand jury investigations and subpoenas constitute a “written demand … for non-monetary relief” and investigations constituted “criminal proceedings for monetary or non-monetary relief” sufficient to trigger coverage); MBIA Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:33 am
Benjamin, 1 A.D.3d 39, 44 (1st Dep’t. 2003). [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:33 am
Benjamin, 1 A.D.3d 39, 44 (1st Dep’t. 2003). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:34 am
First, FCA actions shift the burden of proof from the traditional tax enforcement matter to the taxpayer’s advantage. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
JOpinion Editor’s note: Gary M. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Hilaire, a blog commenting on matters of cultural property law, art law, art crime, cultural heritage policy, antiquities trafficking, looted, antiquities, stolen relics, smuggled antiquities, illicit antiquities, museum risk management, and archaeology. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 4:53 pm
B., 80 A.D.2d 72 (2nd Dept. 1981) the family court awarded custody of the parties’ son to the father, who the son was living with at the time. [read post]
