Search for: "Matter of Will of Church" Results 241 - 260 of 6,343
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 7:37 am by Unreported Opinions
Stephen’s Church, LLC (“Lumenary”), to permit construction of a memory-care facility at […] The post IN THE MATTER OF CALVARY TEMPLE OF BALTIMORE, INC., ET AL. appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:00 pm by Steve Gottlieb
And certainly there are matters of church doctrine that he and I disagreed about. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
This is separate and independent of the internal Church of England investigation, with a full report to be published at the end. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal AI Deepfakes in Campaigns May Be Detectable, But Will It Matter? [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am by Gene Takagi
Any test that turned on result would, as a practical matter, make it impossible for section 501(c)(3) organizations to undertake these important efforts. 2. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 4:49 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  She had a truly good moment as governor of South Carolina when she ordered the removal of the Confederate battle flag from the state capitol after a White supremacist committed mass murder in a Black church. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 12:38 am by David Pocklington
In my judgment the matters above reveal that the proposed works as a whole are based on well evidenced, clearly presented, cogently argued justifications. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm by Ben Sperry
The ordinance, the Court found, might deter perfectly peaceful discussions of matters of importance; “[t]here can be no doubt that such an identification requirement would tend to restrict freedom to distribute information and thereby freedom of expression. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 11:35 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  At home, none of us ever asked about any of that, and Dad never pushed it on us.In fact, my reason for affirmatively rejecting religion, as opposed to falling away from the church quietly over time, is almost entirely a matter of being disgusted by the hypocrisy and irreligiosity of the loudly religious types that I saw in my church and elsewhere. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:15 am by Tristan Marot
Those looking to sidestep an agreement to solve a dispute through arbitration should present compelling reasons why the matter should be settled in court. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
[So concludes a federal judge, issuing a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the law.] [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Edward T. Kang
John Lutheran Church, 414 F.3d 943, 947 (8th Cir. 2005), or to establish jurisdiction for a declaratory judgment, see e.g. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 11:23 pm by David Pocklington
It was suggested that the Faculty process should be put on hold to allow the objector and the petitioners to reach a compromise; however, before the proposals were placed before the Chancellor, and before the objector had a chance to discuss the matter with the PCC, the plaques were removed and the roses were uprooted and disposed of [5]. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:15 am by David Pocklington
Historic England (HE): did not object, subject to certain matters being given more detailed consideration; 19.3. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
I look to his arguments concerning Inter caetera at the 1550–1551 imperial deliberations (junta) held at Valladolid, exploring four interpretive rules Las Casas used: (1) “the will of a ruler is always to be judged in conformity with the law”; (2) the Church’s jurisdiction over non-Christians is strictly limited; (3) legal texts must be interpreted to avoid “inhumanity or absurdity”; and (4) factual recitations matter. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:38 am by Mark S. Humphreys
 Nationwide filed a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss contending, inter alia, that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because MGinnis was an Oklahoma citizen when the lawsuit was filed. [read post]