Search for: "McDonald v. Chicago" Results 241 - 260 of 912
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2015, 10:35 pm
I was very proud to participate in a CAC amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:48 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El argumento del Tribunal de Distrito sostenía que esos casos del Tribunal Supremo fueron revocados por McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
What progress has been made on gun law reform in state legislatures this year? [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Time] Rest of the Economist article is of interest too, especially on ADA filing mills in Florida and elsewhere; In Sheehan v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Napolitano, 604 F.3d 732, 744 (2d Cir.2010) (discussing City of Chicago v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, facial challenges "outside of the First Amendment context" may be permissible "in the presence of a constitutionally-protected right," Dickerson v Napolitano, 604 F3d 732, 744 (2d Cir 2010) (discussing City of Chicago v Morales, 527 US 41 [1999]). [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Indeed, federal district courts have rejected challenges to the firearms licensing schemes that were adopted in the District of Columbia and Chicago following Heller and McDonald. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:33 am by Stephen Bilkis
Summary of the Constitutional Arguments Relying on District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), and McDonald v City of Chicago, 130 S Ct 3020 (2010), defendant argues that PL § 265.01(1) is an unconstitutional prohibition of his right to possess a firearm in his home for the purpose of self-defense. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 11:20 pm
Third, recalling the briefing a few years ago in McDonald v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am by David Cruz
  Yet of the more “conservative” Justices who ruled in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:35 am
For example, libertarians and conservatives worked together to expand judicial protection for Second Amendment rights in District of Columbia v> Heller (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:40 am by Schachtman
” In 2010, Justice Scalia, who was a law-review-producing law professor for the University of Virginia for several years, responded to a lawyer’s oral argument, in McDonald v. [read post]