Search for: "McKenzie v. McKenzie"
Results 241 - 260
of 394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 5:46 am
Peoples Baking Co., 187 S.C. 238, 196 S.E. 887 (1938) and McKenzie v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Concernant le projet de juridiction unifiée, on peut trouver sur le site du Parlement européen un compte-rendu des auditions publiques qui se sont tenues le 11 octobre dernier, et notamment les interventions de Benoît Battistelli, Stephen Jones (Baker & McKenzie LLP), Thomas Kühnen (juge au tribunal de Düsseldorf), Thierry Sueur, Bruno Van Pottelsberghe, et Pierre Véron. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 7:29 am
Whether or not Dr Pelling has appeared in those programmes, I do not know, but he is (I gather) a professional McKenzie friend in certain proceedings. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:42 am
The opinion then cited AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:14 pm
Appearances For the appellant: Bruce McClintock SC and Richard Potter instructed by Baker & McKenzie. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:35 pm
McKenzie (“Debtor”) signed a promissory note establishing a $1,200,000 revolving line of credit with National City. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
The chairman went to great lengths to ensure that the formalities of debate were meticulously observed Regular readers of this weblog will recall that, following the United Kingdom Supreme Court's recent decision to grant permission to appeal against the Court of Appeal's controversial ruling on the application of the "temporary copying" exception in NLA v Meltwater [2011] EWCA Civ 890 [noted by the IPKat here; criticised by Lionel Bently here], Baker &… [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
It was only in 1996, in the celebrated case Common Cause v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 6:12 am
Earlier in the week, this Kat had the pleasure of participating in a public debate at the Baker & McKenzie premises in London on whether the Meltwater decision (see IPKat here) "marks the end of browsing as we know it". [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:21 am
McKenzie, 2011 Ohio 5851, 2011 Ohio App. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
McKenzie; at issue there was one cop’s testimony as to what another cop, who didn’t testify, had told him as to the basis for an arrest… The 5th District kicks out a case for speedy trial violation in State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
On Wednesday 16 November the Privy Council will hand down judgment in Phillip McKenzie v The Queen. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 6:31 am
In Perkins v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:40 pm
On Nov. 3, the 2nd Court ruled in Kathryn and Jeremy Medlen v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:58 pm
Although both parties behaved poorly towards each other, H perhaps worse than W, the very high threshold mandated by the authorities (Miller and McFarlane, S v S, McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] 1 FLR 1508) for conduct to be capable of being reckoned is not crossed. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:05 pm
McKenzie. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 7:23 am
” The McKenzie friend in RP v Notts was of course John Hemming MP. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
Watson’s McKenzie Friend in these proceedings) lives, I am told, in Germany although she has a flat in London. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
Not so very far away, Birgit Clark has just taken up her new position as a trade mark attorney in the London office of international law firm Baker & McKenzie. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
See AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
