Search for: "Medtronic Inc."
Results 241 - 260
of 1,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 523 A.2d 374 (Pa. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm
Medtronic, Inc. was filed in federal court in New York by Jason Nickell, a former Medtronic sales representative. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
Medtronic, Inc., 961 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:11 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 567 F.3d 1314, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 567 F.3d1314, 1336 (Fed. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and would have allowed virtually every claim to escape preemption. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Wyeth, Inc., 850 N.W.2d 353 (Iowa 2014). [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
PDX, Inc., 173 Cal. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:10 pm
Circuit Attorney KBR Privilege Case (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)US Sues KBR for Kickbacks and False Claims Relating to Iraq Support Services Contract (burnpitclaims.blogspot.com)Public Disclosures Don't Bar Halliburton FCA Suit, Court Says (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Medical Device Litigation: Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 10:34 pm
“In July the routine Grade A sampling and testing samples taken by the Idaho Department of Agriculture (ISDA) from the Chobani Idaho Inc. production were visually noted, by the laboratory technician, that surface defects were present and additional testing was conducted noting a yeast like growth developing in the yogurt samples,” FDA reported.The Idaho Department of Agriculture claims it never found any mold and does not know the source of FDA’s information. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 10:49 am
Recently, Nyarady’s successful representation of industry leader Edwards Lifesciences against Medtronic, Inc. resulted a 1 billion-dollar settlement. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:33 pm
By Jason Rantanen This opinion is notable because it involves an emerging split in the Federal Circuit’s jurisprudence on “X plus function” claim language. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 12:15 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 2014 U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008); our numerous postson the subject. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 819 F. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:49 am
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., 469 F.3d 1005 (Fed.Cir. 2006), we stated that the failure to use the word“means” in a claim limitation created a rebuttable presumptionthat 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:58 am
In IPR proceeding involving Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
In an inter partes review Medtronic Inc. et al. v. [read post]