Search for: "Michael Jackson v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 756
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  In 2018, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Two) reversed the trial court's order denying Sony's anti-SLAPP motion, holding that the attribution of the songs to Michael Jackson "did not simply promote sale of the album, but also stated a position on a disputed issue of public interest. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm by Sandy Levinson
"  Whatever one thinks of that as a normative model, it clearly did not survive, say, the election of Andrew Jackson. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am by Barbara Moreno
Perlin, Michael L., Mental Disability and the Death Penalty: The Shame of the States (2013). [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm by Kathryn Robb
Monsters like Jerry Sandusky, Michael Jackson, and Jeffrey Epstein knew this; their grooming of kids, and sometimes parents, was highly effective. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm by Chris Castle
Distributor shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days notice to Owner if the Force Majeure Event affecting Owner is not prevalent throughout the recording industry in the United States and continues for one hundred and eighty (180) days. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Here, the representations that Michael Jackson was the lead singer on the three disputed tracks “did not simply promote sale of the album, but also stated a position on a disputed issue of public interest. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:54 am by Schachtman
Done, “a former pediatrician from Wayne State University. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm by John Floyd
Attorneys (AUSAs) filed a Government’s Sentencing Memorandum in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Late last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 12:11 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Hodgkinson[Affirmed; Beier; February 14, 2020]Improper answer to jury question re: nullificationImproper culpable mental state instruction for burglaryFailure to give accomplice instructionState v. [read post]