Search for: "Michael V. Fair" Results 241 - 260 of 3,078
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
As my Verdict colleague Michael Dorf and I explained in separate columns over on Dorf on Law late last week, that outcome alone is enough to guarantee chaos over the next two years, because still-radicalized House Republicans will stop President Biden’s agenda in its tracks while launching endless investigations of Democrats, impeaching Biden (for reasons to be specified later), and—perhaps most importantly—holding the US and global economies hostage yet again by refusing… [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
With the exception of college-educated women driven to the polls by the Supreme Court’s recent overruling of Roe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (Wolfe v Shawcor Ltd, 2016 ABQB 261) “It seems to me at this point this is somewhat parallel to the Pythonesque description of a particular parrot” (Karl Hermanns v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:44 am by Michael Caruso
Michael CarusoAs David's loyal readers know, this is a momentous year for the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Michael Geist
Why is the government suspending the fair dealing rights of Internet platforms in the bill? [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
              The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
Hildebrant (in 1916), to Smiley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 2:28 pm by Charlotte Garden
ShareOn Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
Michael Hewitt worked for Helix Energy Solutions and later sued for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
One, written by Michael McConnell, argued that Brown  was justifiable on an originalist basis. [read post]