Search for: "Motion to Quash Subpoena"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
Plaintiff had served subpoenas on Defendants, and on June 20, Defendants moved to quash those subpoenas. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 10:15 am
The motion to table carried, Swalwell’s subpoena was quashed, and the hearing continued. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
However, as the Eighth Circuit quashed the subpoena on other grounds, it never reached or resolved this issue. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:30 am
However, rather than petition the EEOC, the employer “only submitted a non-conforming, undated document entitled ‘Notice of Motion to Quash Subpoena,'” which the EEOC received after the five-day deadline. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:30 am
However, rather than petition the EEOC, the employer “only submitted a non-conforming, undated document entitled ‘Notice of Motion to Quash Subpoena,'” which the EEOC received after the five-day deadline. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
So the same arguments can be used in Hillsborough County for a Motion To Disqualify and the Motion To Invalidate based on due process. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:05 am
The Catholic Bishops' emergency motion for a stay (full text) argued that enforcement of the subpoena would violate their 1st Amendment rights and RFRA. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 11:26 am
Now, as the case moves toward trial, a federal district court has rejected a motion filed by the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops attempting to quash a subpoena for documents. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 11:08 am
The Civil Division’s defensive cases include suits alleging negligence under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), including medical malpractice; allegations of unlawful discrimination in federal employment; challenges to agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); suits seeking release of records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act; the defense of government officials sued in their individual capacities… [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:01 pm
Lasnik granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff’s motion to quash subpoenas for personal phone records and bank records, finding that phone records before the plaintiff’s hand injury on the defendant’s fishing boat were “of vital importance to defendants’ theory of the case”, but that the need for pre-incident bank records was not proportional to the needs of...Read the whole entry... [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:01 pm
Lasnik granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff’s motion to quash subpoenas for personal phone records and bank records, finding that phone records before the plaintiff’s hand injury on the defendant’s fishing boat were “of vital importance to defendants’ theory of the case”, but that the need for pre-incident bank records was not proportional to the needs of...Read the whole entry... [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 10:27 am
.), the court granted in part and denied in part Motions to Quash Subpoenas filed by medical malpractice Defendants. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
” Instead, under R Enterprises, “the motion to quash must be denied unless the district court determines that there is no reasonable possibility that the category of materials the Government seeks will produce information relevant to the general subject of the grand jury's investigation. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 9:51 am
Evidence like this is usually subpoenaed and its production can be contested in court and quashed by a judge. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Will it file a motion to quash? [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:10 am
No standing to quash third-party subpoena. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:38 am
Learn the Three Options Each Defendant Has When Receiving an ISP Subpoena including a Motion to Quash the Subpoena In a wonderful win […] The post STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS Motion to Quash Granted in New York – ISP Subpoena Defense appeared first on Torrent Defenders. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:00 pm
Microsoft appealed to the Second Circuit, which reversed the district court’s denial of Microsoft’s motion to quash and contempt order in July 2016. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:04 am
At this point, the defendant could have (a) notified the plaintiff of the subpoena; (b) filed a motion to quash the subpoena; or (c) appeared in court. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
At this point, the defendant could have (a) notified the plaintiff of the subpoena; (b) filed a motion to quash the subpoena; or (c) appeared in court. [read post]
