Search for: "New Jersey v. Smith" Results 241 - 260 of 638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2015, 2:04 pm by Ronald Mann
In an unusual twist, though, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Because doing the job right would require research well beyond prescription medical products, we looked for research help, and enterprising (pun intended) Reed Smith associate Kevin Hara stepped up to handle the initial spadework. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
District Court for the Southern District of New Yorkrecently issued in a civil case:  Robinson v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
Bush was in his first term as president (under $2 in New Jersey). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:39 pm by Jon Sands
New Jersey, the state legislature amended the scheme to provide that the choice of sentences at the upper, middle, or lower terms was within the judge's discretion. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 5:59 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
David StevensonCase Number: 15-cv-03528 (United States District Court for the District of New Jersey)Case Filed: May 26, 2015Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 29, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-63 In the Matter of Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corporation Administrative Proceeding File No.: 3-16567 Case Filed: June 1, 2015 Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 1, 2015 6/30/15 9/28/15 2015-62 SEC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:27 am
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog.Smith & Nephew, Inc. continues to push the plaintiffs out of court in a hip implant case pending in federal court in New Jersey. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
  Since then, the New Jersey Supreme Court more broadly ruled that consumer fraud claims were simply subsumed by that state’s product liability statute. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
  Id. at *4-5.Next the court pared down the plaintiffs’ case by dismissing the claims that are subsumed by the New Jersey Products Liability Act (NJPLA) – implied warranty, negligence, and strict liability. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 3:23 pm by Gene Killian
Do insurance companies discount their premium rates for New Jersey policyholders, since the duty to defend is limited? [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 10:23 am by Gene Killian
Do insurance companies discount their premium rates for New Jersey policyholders, since the duty to defend is limited? [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The inability to distinguish acceleration from causation of new cases would typically redound to the disadvantage of defendants that are making the doubling argument. [read post]