Search for: "Olive v. Olive" Results 241 - 260 of 2,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am by INFORRM
Last month, Mr Justice Warby handed down judgment in Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB), the first libel case to consider the “serious harm” test under section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 within the context of a social media post. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:34 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Draft Chapter, in: Silja Vöneky, Philipp Kellmeyer, Oliver Müller and Wolfram Burgard (ed.) [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Weller v Associated Newspapers ([2015] EWCA Civ 1176) The Court of Appeal has upheld a High Court finding that the publishers of Mail Online infringed the privacy of three of Paul Weller’s children by publishing unpixellated pictures of them on a family shopping trip in Los Angeles. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 3:39 pm by Pillsbury's Construction Law Team
Additional Source: Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas v. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 12:16 pm by Larry
Court of International Trade in Mondiv v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 12:08 pm
Like Oliver Twist standing there with a sad face and an empty oatmeal bowl, our esteemed Regional Office Counsel, one Mr. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:04 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Civil war was a catalyst in forming the jurisprudential views of Thomas Hobbes and Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 10:15 am
 A story of guns, lies, and the convictions that were ultimately spawned.Here's a snippet:"Oliver King, born Hamid Malekpour, is an Iranian-born Canadian citizen and self-described firearms enthusiast. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 7:34 am by INFORRM
The case of Economou v de Freitas ([2016] EWHC 1853 (QB)) was the first case to substantively consider in detail the new “public interest” defence since the Defamation Act 2013 came into force, clarifying that the Court will place a great deal of weight on whether the Defendant “reasonably believed” the publication was in the public interest and not just on whether it was a general matter of public interest. [read post]