Search for: "Other Experts" Results 241 - 260 of 83,136
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2009, 6:05 am
In other words, he or she cannot "buy into" the theory of one side of  the case to the exclusion of the other side. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Matt Conigliaro
Can a jury reject expert testimony that is not contradicted by other expert testimony? [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:58 am by Marcie Mangan
CHICAGO (April 26, 2018) – An expert witness testifying in a personal injury case can seriously undermine its success if he or she is surprised at trial by materials that should have been provided, fails to disclose prior testimony in other cases or isn’t aware of what communications are discoverable by the other side, attorneys say. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
While the Ninth Circuit is stricter with experts than other circuits, the split is surmountable with proper evidence. [read post]
12 May 2018, 1:15 pm by RHP
  Note that some organizations carry more legitimacy than others with regard to certification in dog behavior or animal behavior. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:30 am by Bruce Carton
" On the other hand, courts have refused to accept proposed experts in the field of "shit" and "pimping. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:46 pm
Your attorney can help you challenge an expert witness for the insurance company or find other experts to discredit the defense expert’s testimony. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:46 pm
Your attorney can help you challenge an expert witness for the insurance company or find other experts to discredit the defense expert’s testimony. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
” Some lawyers may think it wonderful to snag the other side’s expert witness, who comes with a credibility credit for having been first identified by the other side. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:35 am by Noelle C. Nelson Ph.D.
There’s a world of difference between assertive expert testimony and defensive expert testimony, where your expert is essentially arguing with opposing counsel.Now, your expert may believe he or she has every good reason to argue with opposing counsel, as in, opposing counsel is dead wrong. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Plaintiff ChromaDex sought to exclude defendant Elysium’s survey expert and damages rebuttal expert, while Elysium moved to exclude ChromaDex’s survey, damages, FDA regulation, and clinical studies experts. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:38 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 provides that A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other... [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:05 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 states that A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other... [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:41 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 provides that A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other... [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:50 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 provides that A witness who is qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise if: (a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other... [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:43 am by Vuyisile Malinga
Only the costs relating to the experts preparing for and adducing expert evidence such as preparation, attendance and qualifying fees were specifically disallowed as there may be other costs of experts which may be found by the taxing officer under Uniform Rule 70(3) to be costs reasonably incurred in relation to the claim. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 9:13 am by Steven Cohen
The court states that an expert witness’s testimony does not need to eliminate all other possible causes of injury to be admissible on the issue of causation. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:25 am by Steve McConnell
They now have to puzzle through how to argue for appealability in one but not the other.)More recently we saw some expert admissibility rulings in a Neurontin suicide case, Smith v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:08 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
However, other cases present complex scientific or medical issues that may require the presentation of an expert witness who is familiar with that particular area. [read post]