Search for: "Pace v. Mays"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,766
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2012, 6:37 am
In Crawford v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
” Read Percy Preston’s (Brett Wilson LLP) interview about the May 2022 High Court’s decision in Smith and others v TalkTalk Telecom Group plc [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
I want to select the means of advertising my music.5 Copyright and Derivative Arguments was originally posted on Copyhype FootnotesWhite-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 1:41 pm
PatentlyOreported on the case of Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:58 am
This post was authored by Gabriella Mickel, Pace University Elisabeth S. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm
See Sher v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
Bowman, --- S.W.3d ----, 2006 WL 658938 (Ky.App.2006)(Opinion Final, May 5, 2006); Allen v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
He also suggests that the stay, by slowing down the pace of the case, may ultimately help opponents of Prop. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 9:19 am
In Kauders v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:55 pm
Today, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a groundbreaking decision in the case State of Ohio v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 9:19 pm
(In three, the petition and/or reply was filed early (05-1126, Twombly; 05-1240, Kato; and 05-1256, Philip Morris v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 10:40 pm
Mackenzie v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:55 am
” This can be true in regard to laws, which sometimes struggle to keep pace with changes in society. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:20 am
A police officer’s power to arrest for a breach of the peace, whether imminent or actual, is at common law, not PACE. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:07 am
The guidelines on DNA retention were introduced under Section 64(1A) of PACE, which provides that samples taken in connection with the investigation of an offence “may” be retained. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:44 pm
An interesting opinion from Judge Neil Gorsuch on the 10th Circuit, Caring Hearts Personal Home Services, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 3:23 am
In view of the conclusive evidence establishing the absence of legal representation by defendants on any personal injury action, the court incorrectly determined that the legal malpractice claim was timely under the continuous representation doctrine (see Pace v Horowitz, 190 AD3d 619 [1st Dept 2021]; Knobel v Wei Group, LLP, 160 AD3d 409, 410 [1st Dept 2018]) and that it was factually sustainable (see Binn v Muchnick, Golieb & Golieb, P.C., 180 AD3d… [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
In the end, Doe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:50 am
In both White v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
By Eric Goldman Online copyright cases have been coming at such a furious pace that I haven't had a chance to keep up. [read post]
