Search for: "Parties in Possession"
Results 241 - 260
of 18,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Therefore, assuming section 11362.77, subdivision (a) of the MMPA, is unconstitutional, as the parties jointly contended, the relevant law on the issue of the amount of marijuana Archer could possess would be section 11362.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and the cases interpreting that statute. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:03 pm
The California General Assembly voted 43-33 along party lines to decriminalize marijuana possession on Tuesday. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:32 am
In theory under the Housing and Planning Act, landlords now have a third choice: they can serve three sets of warning notices on the tenant, named occupiers and any third party deposit payers over a minimum period of two months to get possession without a court order if – (for a tenant paying rent monthly) at least two consecutive months’ worth of rent is unpaid as at the date of service of the second warning notice and the date of the final notice terminating the… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:16 am
The burden of proving each element falls upon the party claiming title by adverse possession, i.e., the plaintiff in the case. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:57 pm
Federal law doesn’t ban such possession, but it does bar gun dealers from selling handguns to 18-to-20-year-olds, which makes handguns available to 18-to-20-year-olds only by the good graces of a nondealer third party who is willing to sell to them. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:02 am
The court granted plaintiff's renewed motion for monetary sanctions for defendants' repeated failure to provide documents in the possession of a third party under common control and in “close coordination” with defendant. [read post]
1 May 2010, 12:09 pm
Title means that the party in adverse possession is listed in a regular chain of transfer of real estate. [read post]
1 May 2010, 12:09 pm
Title means that the party in adverse possession is listed in a regular chain of transfer of real estate. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:15 pm
§ 1920, for taxation by the Clerk against the non-prevailing parties. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 7:24 am
The father would have a standard possession order for the son. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
Plaintiff argued that defendant should produce the witnesses to testify because defendant had “control” over information possessed by its wholly-owned subsidiaries. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:58 am
The arresting office Michael Pier, was responding to a report of a loud party at a Prospect Street residence. [read post]
15 May 2007, 7:46 am
Oklahoma).Appeal of conviction for being felon in possession of firearm and being armed career criminal in possession of firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
24 May 2021, 1:56 am
Both landlords & tenants can use them and their main roles are to give advice and represent the parties (normally the tenants). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:28 am
In the past few years Adderall has been made popular by college students to pull all-nighters to study for exams and with individuals in the party scene. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:19 am
Consider including provisions for joint ownership, shared usage, or alternate possession arrangements if both parties have a significant emotional attachment or investment in certain luxury items. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:58 pm
There is no specific provision that entitles parties to 50/50 possession in Texas as of now, but with the introduction of a bill last legislative session that would have made 50/50 possession a requirement in most cases (see this news story for more information) and with more states moving towards 50/50 possession as their default, it’s no wonder that people have questions about how it works. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 12:33 pm
This makes it uncomplicated and easy to remember for both parties involved. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 3:58 am
The post Payment Terms When Selling TO China: Possession Is Ten-Tenths Of The Law appeared first on China Law Blog. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:33 pm
Although a California Court may properly sanction a non-party insurance carrier who possesses the authority to settle litigation for its failure to participate in a mandatory settlement conference, there is no statutory (nor inherent) authority given the Court to sanction the carrier or a party for its purported failure to negotiate in "good faith. [read post]
