Search for: "Peele v. Peele" Results 241 - 260 of 396
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2013, 1:58 am by Mark Summerfield
Yet – until and unless there is a successful appeal – you may need to keep your eyes peeled for porcine aviators, because a judge in the Federal Court of Australia has done just that, striking down all asserted claims of an innovation patent held by Dynamite Games Pty Ltd (‘Dynamite’) for failing to meet the innovative step threshold. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
  That report is currently being finalised through the appropriate channels so keep your eyes peeled for the full version on INTA's website in due course. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:05 am
In Getchell v Rogers Jewelry, the plaintiff was a jewelry repairman who worked as an independent contractor at the defendant jewelry store in Arden Fair Mall. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:57 am by war
A Mr Brailsford was the registered owner of the Peel Away trade mark for paint stripping preparations, TM No. 741047. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
The Judgment Under An(Apple)Peel In 2008, Schniga (KSB) brought an action for annulment of the Board of Appeal Decision before the General Court. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
United Fabricare Supply, Inc. v. 3Hanger Supply Company, Inc., 2012 WL 2449916 (C.D. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
This is an appeal against the revocation of the patent under consideration by the Opposition Division (OD).Claim 1 of the main request before the Board was identical to claim 1 as granted and read:1. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:29 pm
With season precision, Birgit delivers a chocolate bunny ruling all the way from Austria and peels the wrapping off a fascinating Supreme Court decision. * "So Who Gives Copyright Advice to the Copyright Lawyer? [read post]