Search for: "People v I. S." Results 241 - 260 of 39,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
Here's the Table of Contents that details how I do that: Part I. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
"  But even assuming that reasonable people could disagree about those points, the obvious antisemitic and anti-American campus incidents are too numerous to list comprehensively. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
I congratulate all of our graduating students as I also offer my particular thanks to The Review’s outgoing Editor in Chief, Bryn Hines, and Managing Editor, Jackson Nichols, for their many hours devoted to the publication,” he said. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am by Ilya Somin
It all depends on whether ordinary meaning depends on usage or on people's intuitive theoretical understanding of the concept in question. [read post]
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm by Larry
 I know people might be thinking that you can take notes on any pen-enabled tablet. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
This week the Tenth Circuit vacates that opinion and requests supplemental briefing on how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
But given the errors and alleged data manipulation in Zlokovic’s earlier work, he said, it’s appropriate to scrutinize a clinical trial that would administer the product of his research to people in life-threatening situations. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
However, Justice Kagan’s majority opinion ignored an important sense of how and why people express themselves, so as to make art. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm by Stewart Baker
It's worth noting that, while I've been dunking on Harvard, I could have said the same about AT&T or Genera [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm by Stephen E. Sachs
" For years, many people had assumed that opposing the Supreme Court's decisions in Roe v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The principle requires that the Legislature make the critical policy decisions, while the executive branch's responsibility is to implement those policies" (Matter of LeadingAge N.Y., Inc. v Shah, 32 NY3d 249, 259 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Garcia v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 31 NY3d 601, 608 [2018]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:59 am by Kenan Farrell
While most people are spending their time at the racetrack, Indiana IP litigators are still hard at work. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]