Search for: "People v. Brown (2001)" Results 241 - 260 of 323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:58 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
[iv] Serious people can and should debate the proposal that he pimps. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
These foundational issues have kept black robed people busy for centuries and will continue to do so. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Bill Marler
These are real costs to real people that can and should be prevented. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am by Bill Marler
These are real costs to real people that can and should be prevented. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am by Roger Pilon
In this context, the most important test of the judicial restraint that flowed from the New Deal came, of course, in Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Murano (October 2001–December 2004), and Catherine Woteki (July 1997–January 2001). [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am by admin
Fletcher is a well-known investor –   So was Bernie – and even people who are honest can get way overextended. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:41 pm by Bill Marler
People infected with norovirus usually recover in two to three days without serious or long-term health effects. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Amy Howe
  Some of you may recall that during last Term’s oral arguments in Brown v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:22 am by Ken Kersch
publication of this classic book (Foundation Press, 2001), although highly influential through its use as a classroom text at Harvard Law School, and passed around in (unpublished) manuscript form, the authors simply couldn’t bring themselves to publish this book because, anchored as it was in the structural/process liberalism of the new administrative state, it had almost nothing to say about Brown v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:30 am by John-Paul Boyd
The change a small group of people can make, doing it together — that’s the DIT part of the title of this series of posts, and I now realize that this is the post with which the series should have started — is both remarkable and inspiring. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
" The first country to legalize it was the Netherlands, effective in 2001. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Here's a very rough draft (not yet cite-checked and proofread), which you can also read in PDF; I'd love to hear people's view on it. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
Further, the adoption of lethal injection as a method of execution has resulted in health professionals -- people committed to preserving life where possible -- becoming key participants in executions.There is a diverse range of lethal injection execution protocols and level of physician involvement. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
In 2001, Miller Cassidy merged with Baker Botts, a larger, Texas-based firm, and Barrett spent another year there before leaving for academia. [read post]