Search for: "People v. Jefferson"
Results 241 - 260
of 745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2009, 8:49 pm
Although the Supreme Court held in Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
In Locke v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 7:23 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:00 am
Roosevelt was particularly upset by the Court’s 1935 decision in Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:30 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:42 pm
I submit that of the 3 people on the stage that night, Palin was the one who got it right on that question. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:46 pm
Tibbs, From Black Power to Prison Power: The Making of Jones v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
While we haven’t seen the entire interview yet, we know Scalia, interviewed by Leslie Stahl, will hit Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:54 pm
; and Calder v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
” Eldred v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The dues cases and the taxpayer-standing cases appear to implement a statement of Thomas Jefferson, who declared: “to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
” — Thomas Jefferson “History is a relentless master. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 2:17 pm
(See U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:48 am
In Watts v. [read post]
