Search for: "People v. Mike"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2013, 8:39 am
The ACLU came to our defense, winning a landmark Supreme Court decision in Tinker v Des Moines (1969). [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:20 am
V for victory sign introduced. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:01 pm
As I noted Monday, several new filings in the lacrosse case have come in, all dealing with the Supreme Court's recent decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
(Here is my previous post on false dichotomies, and here is a related post from Mike Ramsey.) [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:02 pm
Mike's Hard Lemonade. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:29 pm
(The case is Golan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 6:43 am
In Armour v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:11 am
Very broadly reading the terms of the 2009 Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:00 am
Mike Paulsen: Thanks for "interviewing" us, Jack! [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
Many of these same people likely would become delegates in an actual Article V convention. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:40 am
Or so, at least, one can hope.Posted by Mike Dorf [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:56 pm
In an 1890 case called Hans v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 8:48 pm
His Justice Department's decision not to defend DOMA in court is based on the narrow ground that DOMA was motivated by "animus" towards gay people in violation of Romer v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:42 pm
By Mike Dorf On Wednesday, the Supreme Court handed down a 5-4 ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
Now one needs to say more about prejudice, of course, but I think the basic idea is captured in what is wrong with Justice Scalia's dissenting view in Romer v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Boyd v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
Note from Mike Dorf: In response to the doubts I raised about his argument concerning the constitutionality of Rep. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm
We don’t decide that we’re going to do it on half of what people tell you is needed. [read post]
