Search for: "People v. Potter" Results 241 - 260 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm by Ken White
Rowling, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone 113-22 (1997). [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
By the time most people find us findings of facts have been made. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am by John-Paul Boyd
Because the judge must also be fair to the other party and consider the needs of other people’s court proceedings, the judge may have to limit the time you have or ask you questions that help you get to the legal issues involved in your case. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by SHG
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:17 pm by David Lat
— author of the colorful opinion in Gustafson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 8:03 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
While books are free, A/V materials are not: there’s a small rental fee. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
 When pasteurization started to become more mainstream early last century, some people were suspicious of the technology. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
  I suppose the initial audience is people who asked me questions at these sessions. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm by Douglas Cantwell
” Like pornography in Justice Potter Stewart’s famous quip, are we expected to trust that states will know it when they see it? [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
  Is there something about March 30 that breeds people who turn their blues into art?) [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
Potter Stewart’s 1959 confirmation hearing is a case in point. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
  He added: “The only people I think need privacy are people who do bad things. [read post]