Search for: "People v. Quick"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Mailley (2022) EWHC 2328 (QB) A quick note on this possession claim, which involves a challenge to Section 87 Housing Act 1985 as incompatible with Article 8 and 14 ECHR. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
People’s Republic of China; Greco v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Some people may possess a sense of fairness that opposes disproportionately high taxes on them as a matter of principle, but for most, what matters more is how it affects the broader public: what it does for the Commonwealth’s economy, understood in terms of jobs, growth, opportunity, and income-earning potential for individuals who will never join the rarified company of those actually remitting under the proposed surtax. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:29 am
John Morgan was not the first advertising attorney following the 1977 Supreme Court case of Bates v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Reconsidering the Vertical Merger Guidelines and carefully scrutinizing vertical mergers The FTC and DOJ both were quick to announce that they are revisiting the 2020 Vertical Merger Guidelines, as “encouraged” by the Executive Order. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:55 am
BrandTotal * Quick Links From the Past Year, Part 1 (CCPA and Privacy) * Three More Yearbook/People Database Cases Signal Trouble for Defendants * My Comments on the California Consumer Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) Rulemaking * Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Nken v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
Quick links Farrah Ahmed, International Journal of Constitutional Law: What Establishment Expresses. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:47 am
This factor leads us to the very lengthy footnote 48 in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:21 am
Regarding a reasonable expectation of privacy, a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 noted that people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in an area, location or circumstance if the person does not expect to be secretly recorded or observed. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:15 am
U.S. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 11:55 pm
In England, the estimated number of people testing positive for COVID-19 equated to 3.86% of the population, or around 1 in 25 people; in Wales it was around 1 in 30 people; 1 in 17 people in Northern Ireland; and 1 in 20 people in Scotland. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 4:18 am
How many people are affected by SLAPPs? [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 10:38 am
Twitter has filed a petition for rehearing en banc. * DC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
If parents have a right to send their children to private schools, as Pierce v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 2:11 pm
From Bailey v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 3:33 pm
Is this bill, under Boerne v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:59 am
The court’s opinion in Green v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:57 am
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]
