Search for: "People v. Score"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,628
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
Courts had long adapted common-law rules to “new conditions arising out of modern progress”; now they should recognize that “the upper air is a natural heritage common to all of the people. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 9:25 pm
To quote Judge Amul Thapar in Vitolo v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
My blog posts are read by the people who need to read them. [read post]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
The main event is another case, Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 1:24 pm
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 10:58 am
New Relist Berger v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:18 am
At the war’s height, an average of 17 people were killed per day. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
The pageant does limit itself to people "born … Female with Female Anatomy. [read post]
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 7:01 pm
His legal team argued for years that Johnson was ineligible for the death penalty under Atkins v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Then I decided to make a concerted effort to meet these people in person, and we did. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 2:50 pm
“2019 was a big deal for Accessibility, after the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of Robles v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Post 2 (of 2) on Clews v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:30 am
Post 2 (of 2) on Clews v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
I believe that it is, but I should be clear that this is no reason for people to give up trying to prove me wrong. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 9:22 am
But at the same time, we don’t know these people. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
