Search for: "People v. Stevens"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2014, 6:23 pm
And Taub righly frames Nobelman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 1:06 pm
” United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:18 pm
We agree with defendant that the court's statements do not amount to a description of the range of the potential sentences but, rather, they constitute impermissible coercion, "rendering the plea involuntary and requiring its vacatur" (People v Fanini, 222 AD2d 1111; see People v Stevens, 298 AD2d 267, 268, lv dismissed 99 NY2d 585; People v Wilson, 245 AD2d 161, 163, lv denied 91 NY2d 946). [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 10:52 am
Just FYI.Hinkson v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:58 am
Supreme Court released its opinion in Graham v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:36 pm
(In polyamorous lingo, our relationship is known as a 'V; I’m the 'hinge' of the V and my two partners are the vertices.)" [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:39 am
In any event, as Steven Pinker notes in a recent piece in the Atlantic "in a free society, these annoyances are naturally regulated in the marketplace of people's reactionsâ€â [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:12 pm
This, of course, is a very different holding and standard than the New York Court of Appeals had set forth in People v Ford (86 NY2d 397) in which the Court held that while it is ineffective assistance to affirmatively give bad advice on the immigration consequences, attorneys need not say anything. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:02 am
(John Daniel Tinder, Judge), Circuit Judge Flaum writes: Steven D. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Tyler Maulsby argues that Flowers v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 2:59 pm
In a Slate column prompted by Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am
” And in The Economist, Steven Mazie concludes that the Justices “seemed divided about how to resolve” the case. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 2:06 pm
” Whatever you want to call it, Scalia talks about the right of individual people first. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
In the recent case of London Borough of Hillingdon v Neary [2011] EWHC 413 (COP) the issue of media access to Court of Protection proceedings arose for determination. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:55 pm
I know that many people have already seen this (it's a bit old), but I thought I'd comment on this op-ed by Professor Steven Calabresi. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:05 pm
In People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:44 am
By: Steven M. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:19 pm
Carrier: McCormick v. [read post]
