Search for: "People v. Waits" Results 241 - 260 of 5,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2023, 8:22 am by Phil Dixon
See G.S. 14-208.43 (for people ordered onto SBM on or after Dec. 1, 2021) and G.S. 14-208.46 (for people ordered onto SBM before Dec. 1, 2021). [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:16 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, the specifics of the indictment seem entirely immaterial to most people. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm by Lawrence Taylor
EMTs are often waiting as well just in case someone has reached a dangerously high blood alcohol concentration. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 2:40 am by SHG
And if we have a system where people have to wait in jail for two or three years before they have a trial, that’s not due process. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
” Elster argues in opposition that the issue arises rarely and the court should wait for a circuit split. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:11 pm by Bill Berenson
The second-highest number of deaths, in California with 10 million more people, was 437. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
The transaction raised eyebrows due to Sun’s ties to the CCP and his former military service with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Underwood, the Supreme Court invalidated a similar provision of the Alabama constitution that disenfranchised people convicted of crimes “involving moral turpitude. [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:43 am
To me, the parties can easily wait a little while longer to make sure that we get this final -- likely dispositive -- question right. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
Although at least 15 people have been sentenced for seditious conspiracy since the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
Supreme Court later cribbed from him in its famous unenumerated rights case of Meyer v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:54 am by Michael C. Dorf
A First Amendment challenge to the law made it to the Supreme Court itself, which, in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
People with access to high-quality information will get ahead. [read post]