Search for: "Post v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 241 - 260
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am
Perkins, 12-126), clarification of how the Internal Revenue Service calculates the foreign tax credit in a case involving a British “windfall tax” on utility companies (PPL Corporation v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:21 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 11-3478 (7th Cir. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:47 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 816 F.2d 311, 312 (7th Cir. 1987)). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
V. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:33 pm
Commissioner, T.C. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm
Food and Drug Administration.So guess who is actively seeking the FDA's top post? [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:25 am
The whole post is very much worth reading. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
On the same day there is an application concerning mode of trial in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police before Tugendhat J. [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:13 pm
Commissioner and the majority's holding that the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:00 am
The underlying fight was about a tax deficiency, but the legal question was whether the Internal Revenue Service could adopt a regulation that effectively overruled a prior U.S. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:33 am
Commissioner. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm
In Turner v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
Equipment Holding Co., 11-657, and Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 11-582, is likely being held for United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 4:00 pm
The Internal Revenue Service Commissioner eventually issued a notice of deficiency for the amount of the parsonage allowance allocated to the second home. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
Food and Drug Administration.So guess who is actively seeking the FDA's top post? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:08 am
The 11th Circuit held that the “singular-to-plural” provision should only apply if the context of section 107(2) of the Internal Revenue Code supports such an application. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
At the Solicitor General’s request, the Court appears to be holding Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 8:55 am
U.S. v. [read post]
