Search for: "Pure Power, LLC" Results 241 - 260 of 340
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 6:51 am
I am profoundly skeptical of the argument that HFTs are pure market makers as this term has historically been understood because they are not active market makers. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:03 pm by Gene Takagi
If the entity is best served by being an LLC, should it be an L3C? [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:10 am by Don Cruse
Private pipelines: Eminent domain cannot be used for purely private use Texas Rice Land Partners Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
 -------Tanner Pittman, LLC regularly advises clients and assists with petitions for year's support, year's support litigation, and other probate and estate matters. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
If, however, we step away from a purely textual analysis of the statute, the answer to this riddle may lie in §409(a)'s derivation. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
  In theory, under a pure first-to-file system, inventorship is resolved by whichever inventor has filed first and there would be no need for any form of interference proceeding. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
  The first possible ground for decision is purely a matter of interpreting the language of the tax statutes. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 3:16 am by SHG
" Posted by: Voodoo94 | Jan 5, 2012 8:22:42 AM© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:16 am by SHG
© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:53 am by Kendall Gray
Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLC--Pipelines can exercise eminent domain in Texas, right? [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
A Primer on the Federal Court Challenge to the State of Hawaii Land Use Commission’s Power to Reclassify Land Upon an Order to Show Cause by Paul J. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
 Going further, the Court announced its intention to appoint its own damages experts to testify at trial, stating:   Judge Alsup relied on the authority of Monolithic Power Sys. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Department of Health and Human Services Docket: 11-398 Issue: Whether Congress had the power under Article I of the Constitution to enact the minimum coverage provision. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:54 am by Sabrina Shadi
The plaintiffs argued that Penske’s purely intrastate operations in this case brought them outside of the FAAA Act’s regulatory scope. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am by SHG
H/T Our hinterlands correspondent, Kathleen Casey  © 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]