Search for: "ROBERT C. SMITH" Results 241 - 260 of 1,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced encephalopathy, or fenfluramine-related cardiac injury, constitute the… [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The lawyer for Ben Roberts-Smith says his client is desperate to clear his name in an open court in his long awaited defamation trial against three former Fairfax newspapers continues to be hampered by national security concerns raised by the attorney general. [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
ProPublica – Robert Faturechi and Derek Willis | Published: 5/6/2020 U.S. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
At Justia’s Verdict blog, Rodger Citron suggests that the critical question is “which Chief Justice John Roberts will show up. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The Sydney Morning Herald had a piece “Ben Roberts-Smith defamation trial delayed”. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Joining Justice Alito’s dissent were Chief Justice Roberts (in full) and Justice Kagan (in part). [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 10:22 am by Eric Goldman
Over its quarter-century history, eBay has had numerous industry-defining legal accomplishments, including: the VeRO program as a supplement to the DMCA’s 512(c) safe harbor; the U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Ira C. Lupu and Robert Tuttle
Smith (1990), cases about the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment are proliferating at the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Patricia Hughes
Rather, its powers derive from sections 60(2)(c) and (d) and 63(1) and 63(4) of the Judges Act (it is constituted under section 59 of the Judges Act). [read post]