Search for: "ROBERT FELDMAN"
Results 241 - 260
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2017, 4:40 am
” Another look at the decision comes from Robert Weisberg at Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, who observes that the “Court’s decision will make moral sense to many, but it also illustrates how race can challenge the usual boundaries of constitutional law. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 7:30 pm
Robert Barnes and Gregory S. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:01 am
” At UtilityDIVE, Robert Walton observes “that Gorsuch lacks a large body of specific energy- or environment-specific cases, but is expected to be very conservative. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
Feldman, 81 Brooklyn L. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:40 am
At Empirical Scotus, Adam Feldman also explores the effect a Gorsuch vote might have in various areas of the law, summarizing the judge’s most-cited opinions and his dissents. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:26 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes considers the role Chief Justice John Roberts will play in the inauguration, noting that Donald Trump criticized Roberts on the campaign trail, but concluding that if “there is any tension between Roberts and Trump, it probably will not be evident from the chief justice’s demeanor. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman assesses the importance of the 29 cases argued so far this term according to the number of words spoken by the justices at oral argument, the number of amicus briefs filed in the case, and the number of newspaper articles published within a day of the argument. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:07 pm
" And in commentary, online at Bloomberg View, law professor Noah Feldman has an essay titled "Supreme Court Gets Between Schools and Parents. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:05 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has an article headlined "A tale of bar tabs and deli sandwiches stymies a few Supreme Court justices. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Ian Samuel and Dan Epps look at some of the cases on this week’s argument agenda and discuss Chief Justice John Roberts’ recent recusal in Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 4:13 am
Ted Cruz criticizing the new National Museum of African American History and Culture’s treatment of Justice Clarence Thomas has “raised the temperature on a simmering controversy,” noting that “Thomas has not commented on the controversy, and neither has Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., who serves ex officio as chancellor of the Smithsonian and a member of its board of regents. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
” In a Bloomberg View column, Noah Feldman argues that the Senate’s refusal to consider the nomination of Chief Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court has created “a new norm” in which the “Senate will confirm Supreme Court appointees only if the president and the Senate majority are of the same party. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 7:08 pm
In today's edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined "Supreme Court rules for Samsung in smartphone patent dispute. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:23 am
This is why Feldman got a D- rather than an F. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes answers three common questions about the Supreme Court in a Donald Trump administration, noting, among other things, that judicial ethics experts say “federal laws would not prohibit Trump from nominating” his sister to the court. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:32 pm
"Former Roberts Court Clerks' Success Litigating Before the Supreme Court": Adam Feldman has posted this paper online at SSRN. [read post]
19 Nov 2016, 4:16 am
But Feldman’s circumlocution applies to every decision ever. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:31 am
Commentary on the election and the court comes from Ryan Owens, who observes in The Washington Post that “Chief Justice Roberts had a very, very good election night,” and that he “could become the first chief justice in modern history to be both the chief and the median justice — the ‘swing justice. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
In her column in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse observes that “Chief Justice Roberts heads a court that a harsh political spotlight has rendered too easy to dismiss as just another political branch of government, its members just politicians in robes,” and cautions that “he needs to make it clear that the Roberts court is not a tool of partisan politics. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes at The Washington Post, who notes that the event included “what have become familiar eulogies” to Scalia’s “writing skills and his impact on the law. [read post]
