Search for: "ROBERTS v. FAIR" Results 241 - 260 of 3,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 3:06 am by Tom Smith
Three decades of remorseless ideological and cultural combat—over Robert Bork, over Clarence Thomas and Anita Hill, over Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich, over Bush v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “[t]he justices spent a fair amount of time … asking lawyers whether Trump’s past comments mean he is forever forbidden from acting against a country with a Muslim majority. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:32 am by Tejinder Singh
As almost all Americans who have ever watched television or gone to a movie know, the Supreme Court held in a case called Miranda v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
Robert Barnes’ coverage for the Washington Post is available here. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:20 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Still waiting on the very ripe cases of Martinez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:05 am by Peter N. Cubita
Supreme Court ruled this morning that disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:20 pm
It seems fair to say that, among legal scholars, Chief Justice Roberts's reference to the work of baseball umpires, and his suggestion that the work of the Court's justices should resemble, somehow, that of umpires, has not been greeted with wild approval. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am by Nate Persily
All of these variables are statistically significant in regressions in which perceived fairness of Bush v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 11:05 am by lennyesq
“It is ironic that a process designed to ensure fairness to all players has been used unfairly against one player,” he added. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 8:09 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Back in early January, news broke that New Jersey banker and alleged anti-vegetarianite Robert Catalanello had sued Arizona State law professor Zachary Kramer over an article in which Kramer discussed then-pending litigation involving Catalanello (see Workplace, TaxProf, and Leiter for more). [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:41 am by Madelaine Lane
In People v Roberts, the Court of Appeals upheld MCL 750.145c, which prohibits the production of child sexually abusive material, concluding that it is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. [read post]