Search for: "Russo v. Russo"
Results 241 - 260
of 437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2017, 5:00 am
Tenured teacher unwilling to improve her pedagogical skills despite being provided with substantial assistance terminated from her positionBroad v New York City Bd. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:24 am
" The Court of Appeals sends the case to the jury.The case is Ahmed v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:30 am
Russo, where a jury found that an employee had failed to comply with a confidentiality agreement and awarded the ex-employer $500,000. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
See, e.g., Russo v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
See, e.g., Russo v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
See, e.g., Russo v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
His discussion of Utah's trade secret statute, and the availability of unjust enrichment damages, comprises only part of his opinion for the 10th Circuit in Russo v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:47 am
The Appeals Court recently issued a decision, Russo v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:47 am
The Appeals Court recently issued a decision, Russo v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:11 am
Palm Bay Imports Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 1:02 am
Russo. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Russo, Religious Freedom in Faith-Based Educational Institutions in the Wake of Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 4:07 am
Lowinger v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Now we wait.Karen Partenan v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
" The court found that in this instance there was substantial evidence to support SDHR’s determination that Russo was not discriminated against by the Department because of her gender.Although agreeing with SDHR's determination that most of the employment actions at issue were not adverse because they did not constitute "materially adverse change[s] in the terms and conditions of [Russo’s] employment," the Appellate Division concluded that the… [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 4:35 am
Russo v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:30 am
Citing Russo v NYC Department of Education, 25 NY3d 946, the court rejected the Board’s contention to the contrary and held that “the excessiveness of a penalty is a basis upon which an arbitration award may be vacated.The court ruled that in this instance “the penalty of termination was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, citing the so-called Pell Doctrine, Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School… [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:36 pm
Vincent Russo - Staff to Success. [read post]
