Search for: "S. T. v. B. F. (NOW S.), ET AL."
Results 241 - 260
of 365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
Halliburton Co., et al., 597 F.3d 330, 335 (5th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
Thermo-Ply (PATracer) Honeywell – Patentee appeals finding of patent invalidity under on-sale bar provisions of § 102(b): Honeywell v Nikon (PATracer) Nalco – Nalco appeals from grant of preliminary injunction against it from infringement patent directed to method of removing or transferring metals and/or amines from crude oil: Baker Hughes v Nalco (PATracer) Nutriset - Access to food now an IP issue? [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
Maacama Watershed Alliance, et al v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Rev. 609 (1998) READ 620-636 Supreme Court of the United StatesRoy ROMER, Governor of Colorado, et al., Petitioners,v.Richard G. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
SHC Laguna Niguel I, LLC et al, 2021 WL 2165208 (C.D. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
case=14595711359472781380&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr SALLIE MANESS, Plaintiff,v.BOSTON SCIENTIFIC, et al., Defendants. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Farris et alAT&T v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
V. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
A pdf of the TTAB's decision with scant analysis -- from about six weeks ago -- in North Atlantic Operating Co., Inc. et al v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 7:49 pm
Given that men who fail to complete treatment are younger, less educated, and more antisocial than treatment completers (Wierzbicki & Pekarik, 1993), critics have interpreted Hall's study as further evidence of the stability of individual differences in recidivism potential (Harris et al., 1998).In the next major meta-analysis, Gallagher et al. (1999) examined 22 studies (25 treatment comparisons). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
District Judge Robert B. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
The court rejected the insurer’s argument regarding “Direct means Direct” and criticized such legal interpretation: “[t]he ‘direct means direct’ approach suffers the flaw of attempting to define a term through the very language requiring definition. . . . [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
In Dominguez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:42 am
Metromail Cy Pres Fund, The Supnick, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
We all tend to take these practices for granted, but you can’t. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
Notably, the number of non-O157 STEC cases reported to CDC’s FoodNet has risen steadily each year; from 2000-2006, there was an overall 4-fold increase in incidence (0.12 cases per 100,000 to 0.42 cases per 100,000 population) at FoodNet sites. [read post]
