Search for: "SMITH v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT" Results 241 - 260 of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2012, 2:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, this claim was not supported by an expert affidavit opining that plaintiff's services "deviated from accepted industry standards" and that this failure proximately caused the loss of the claimant's case (Columbus v Smith & Mahoney, 259 AD2d 857, 858 [1999]; see Travelers Indem. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:57 am by admin
Smith   Wheeling gulls spin and glide You’ve got no place to hide ‘Cause you don’t need one – Crosby Stills and Nash, Lee Shore   Some cases are born momentous (NFIB v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
Let's see what the Secretary for State says.Something to read? [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Consolidation Coal Company v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Carolina Foam Industries, Inc., 935 P.2d 876, 883, (Ariz. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am by Schachtman
  The industrial hygienist, James Stewart, estimated Milward’s benzene exposure, both total and from individual products. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am by Venkat
(See the Ozimals ruling, “17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices” but see the Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  The opinion suggests that the state all but conceded that this was the proper outcome of the case under Carey v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:25 am by Florian Mueller
Apple FRAND determination by Mr Justice Marcus Smith (High Court of Justice, England and Wales) has been my most popular patent-related blog post in recent months. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
  Since then, the New Jersey Supreme Court more broadly ruled that consumer fraud claims were simply subsumed by that state’s product liability statute. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 4. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm by Ilya Somin
I also agree with Brad [Smith's] nomination of Schechter Poultry v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
United States, United States v. [read post]