Search for: "STATE v HANDY"
Results 241 - 260
of 525
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 8:19 pm
For the most part this does not create any problems, and in fact can be handy when we want to avoid bearing the brunt of lawyer jokes at parties. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm
An order obtained by a party sealing a record must specifically state the facts that support these findings. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:56 am
Because you should always use the grid that was in place when the defendant committed his or her crime—and there’s no flexibility on that, by the way, State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:31 pm
In Terry v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:02 am
They will come in handy. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
Hoffman-La Roche Limited v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:19 pm
This in particular since “the public retains only an imperfect memory of the marks registered in the Member States or of Community marks ... [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
Postnups may also come in handy for trust fund babies. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 12:06 am
Dieser kurze Beitrag untersucht, ob die Vereinigten Staaten durch das Abhören des Handys der Kanzlerin Regeln des Völkerrechts verletzt haben. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
Meade: a third day of CCTV-broadcasted proceedings in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
He stated: "The system of amending patents is an integral part of the patent system. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:20 pm
There is some good news: The government had also moved to stay First Unitarian Church v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:42 am
In Harrison v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 6:12 am
Judge Schroeder invokes the handy Miller v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:06 am
I previously blogged about the case here: Password protect your phone if you care about your privacy: What R v Fearon means Here is also a handy summary from the SCC: 35298 Kevin Fearon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
Similarly in, Quinlan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:04 pm
We may see a third Apple v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
[If you want some handy tips on how to speed-read all those comments, try the Wired How-To Wiki, here] In case you missed it, Eli Lilly and Company v Human Genome Sciences, Inc UKSC 2012/0220 is not going on appeal to the United Kingdom's Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
