Search for: "STATE v POUND"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2016, 2:55 pm
£250 for the poor state of the property on readmission. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:56 pm
Michael v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 1:35 pm
Ferren v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm
The Spectator [£] considers the importance of open media and citizen journalists in a recent article. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:35 am
Richard began by stating that he does not believe the case has changed the law. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 1:36 am
Nunes v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
The revelations came in a hearing in the case of Heather Capital Ltd (In Liquidation) v Levy & McRae and others - naming suspended Sheriff Peter Watson amid a series of allegations in relation to the £400m collapse of the Heather Capital Hedge Fund. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
" Turning to the authorities, Mr Justice Moylan stated (at paragraph 61): "My task is to determine "the division of property which best achieves the fair overall outcome": Charman v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
Ahmed & Ors v Murphy [2010] EWHC 453 (Admin) This was an appeal to the High Court of a decision by the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC) that the maximum fair rent payable by Mr Murphy for the flat in Brick Lane, Spitalfields was £8.50 per week. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 10:59 am
A dental hygienist sued (Harris v Hutcheson) claiming she was discriminated against and terminated due to her weight. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms [2000] AC 115, 126E-G. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:07 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 2:17 am
There have been various attempts to allow for costs outside this £50,000, most notably in Henderson v All Around the World [2013] EWPCC 19 (27 March 2013) re the ATE insurance premium (at that time recoverable from the other side) and OOO Abbott v Design & Display Limited [2014] EWHC 3234 (IPEC) (10 October 2014) re costs on the indemnity basis from the period after the Relevant Period for the Part 36 offer has expired at [21]. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Proving Causation in Medical Malpractice Cases - Sienkiewicz v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:47 pm
This got short shrift from the judge who quoted the Hoffman v Dare judgment. [read post]
27 May 2015, 10:19 am
In Save-A-Lot Food Stores v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 8:59 am
However, it then went on to state that it had “no hesitation” in returning the full sums paid to the Applicants. [read post]
