Search for: "STATE v WATERS" Results 241 - 260 of 10,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
President Joe Biden stated that the decision “upends the legal framework that has protected America’s waters for decades. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:28 pm by Kalvis Golde
Ernest Bock LLC 23-308Issue: Whether a stay of federal proceedings under Colorado River Water Conservation District v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Prince, Penn State Dickinson Law ERISA plan fiduciaries must be permitted to consider ESG factors when selecting plan investments. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Army Corps of Engineers has prevented a Louisiana landowner from developing his land because it's supposedly a wetland connected to "waters of the United States," even though the land is mostly dry and miles away from any interstate navigable waters. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
” The California State Water Resources Control Board approved a regulation that permits the release of purified wastewater into the public water system. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:57 am by CMS
In this post, David McKie, Partner, and Dany Bitar, Associate in the litigation team at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Argentum Exploration Ltd (Respondent) v Republic of South Africa (Appellant). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:55 am by Danielle Anz
Still, state policymakers must resist the temptation to push planning for water scarcity. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
  The case that prompted the discussion was the Aarow Equipment & Services, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Some U.S. officials have warned that using seawater may endanger Gaza’s water supply. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:57 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
The International Adjudication of Environmental Disputes 30 Years Later Riccardo Luporini, Climate Change Litigation before International Human Rights Bodies: Insights from Daniel Billy et al. v. [read post]