Search for: "STEPHEN LAW V." Results 241 - 260 of 7,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2018, 9:44 am by Harold O'Grady
Evaluating Delaware’s Dominance of Corporate Law (edited by, among others, UCLA Law Professors Stephen Bainbridge and James Park, formerly of Brooklyn Law School). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:13 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Law. 2103, 2122 mm. 59 and 64 (2020): Professor Stephen Bainbridge argues... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:56 am by Andrew Morgan
The US Supreme Court [official website] on Monday ruled [opinion, PDF] 6-2 in Voisine v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:05 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
I wrote it for a symposium on state constitutional law, and it appeared in a collection edited by Paul Finkelman and Stephen Gottlieb, Toward a Usable Past: Liberty under State Constitutions, and was republished in the Iowa Law Review (1990). [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:19 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Justice Stephen Breyer cited other areas of the law in which lower court judges have discretion. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm by David Zaring
Indeed it's notable that such programs never focus on producing successful genre writers -- i.e., the next Stephen King or John Grisham -- but are rather dedicated almost exclusively to literary fiction. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 4:51 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Stephens (Prisoner; Religious Freedom)Steward v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:40 am by Andrew Hamm
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
McCallum considered the decision of the Victorian Court of Appeal in Herald and Weekly Times v Popovic and the Victorian Supreme Court in Belbin v Lower Murray Urban and Rural Water Corporation. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:45 pm by Francis Pileggi
Professor Stephen Bainbridge has provided a list of the most “over-studied” topics in corporate law. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 5:27 pm by Mark Summerfield
  Accordingly, as the law now stands compensation for infringement of a divisional innovation patent cannot be claimed back to the original date of the parent application. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:43 am by Sarah Cole
I had a nice chat about Jackson with Professor Stephen Ware at our 20th law school reunion this past weekend. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:13 am by CMS
In this case comment, Caitlin Heard, Frances Denney and Robert Stephen, who all work within the intellectual property team at CMS, comment on the judgment handed down by the Supreme Court in June 2020 in the matter of Regeneron v Kymab [2020] UKSC 27, which concerns whether patents were invalid for insufficiency. [read post]