Search for: "Samples v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 4,545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
To conclude, Passman stated that the decision to choose a trust ultimately comes down to the artist’s goals. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
While monitoring developments on the SEC’s proposed rules, financial institutions also should continue to assess their climate-related disclosures under the SEC’s 2010 Guidance Regarding Disclosure Related to Climate Change and the SEC’s Sample Letter to Companies Regarding Climate Change Disclosure, which address the SEC’s expectations on climate-related disclosures under its existing framework. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:58 pm by Michael Oykhman
R v SG stated that an invitation occurs when the accused asks for permission to touch the victim or if the accused asks the victim to touch the accused. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 8:28 am by Russell Knight
“Any party may by written request direct any other party to produce for inspection, copying, reproduction photographing, testing or sampling specified documents, including electronically stored information as defined under 201 (b)(4), objects or tangible things…or to disclose information calculated to lead to the discovery of the whereabouts of any of these items, whenever the nature, contents, or condition of such documents, objects, tangible things, or real estate is… [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
It uses Stable Diffusion, an AI art model, to sample artwork from artists that never consented to their work being used. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am by Michael Oykhman
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 9:55 am by Michael Oykhman
To prove the crime of hostage taking, the Crown must show that the accused intended to ‘force the hand’ of or compel a person, group, state, international organization or intergovernmental organization other than the hostage to commit an act or omit to do something (usually this is to the hostage taker’s benefit but it doesn’t need to be). [read post]
  So, in that spirit, I asked the Lawfare senior editorial team to write a few paragraphs to reflect on what happened in their areas of expertise in 2022, offering their own thoughts and a sampling of Lawfare’s coverage. [read post]