Search for: "Sears, in Matter of"
Results 241 - 260
of 556
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 2:31 pm
The organization of local governments, on the surface a merely technical matter, has fallen victim to a similar pattern of what public choice scholars call “rent-seeking…. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:52 pm
A force of nature, Carmel practised solely in matrimonial matters, as she said back then, and was beloved by her clients. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:54 am
Morton and Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:14 am
The pan-seared breast of Chicken Marsala served by the Baltimore Convention Center’s exclusive caterer was the food item most commonly consumed by the 216 attendees who were sickened by the lunch served last April 9 at the Food Safety Summit’s annual conference. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Statements on matters of purely private concern do not fall within a generally unpr [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:22 am
The reasons for action matter. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:01 am
Sears Holdings Corporation, et al, 1-11-cv-08539 (ILND September 10, 2014, Order) (Dow, J.) [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:10 pm
It was copied by Richard Warren Sears in 1894 when the first Sears, Roebuck and Co. mail order catalog hit the post. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 12:21 pm
Sears, Roebuck & Co., 727 F.3d 796 (7th Cir. 2013) and Pella Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
Sears has been to the Court before. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:52 pm
In Sears Roebuck & Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The attractive possthility that ordinary Americans might he able to obtain simple legal services quickly and easily was of no matter. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Telus pulls out of wireless lobby group http://t.co/gxUXRHaNdJ -> Quebec defends English Facebook page for N.Y. office http://t.co/yv6cwN1KSm -> Troubled Bitcoin exchange files for bankruptcy http://t.co/I6B97wO5IA -> Sears launches investigation into possible security breach http://t.co/Btfb5KD9p4 -> Engineers Allege Hiring Collusion in Silicon Valley http://t.co/xG8nmFUMhM -> PSL now owns exclusive copyright for betting on its fixtures http://t.co/T5Eo0b6jdg -> IT… [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Telus pulls out of wireless lobby group http://t.co/gxUXRHaNdJ -> Quebec defends English Facebook page for N.Y. office http://t.co/yv6cwN1KSm -> Troubled Bitcoin exchange files for bankruptcy http://t.co/I6B97wO5IA -> Sears launches investigation into possible security breach http://t.co/Btfb5KD9p4 -> Engineers Allege Hiring Collusion in Silicon Valley http://t.co/xG8nmFUMhM -> PSL now owns exclusive copyright for betting on its fixtures http://t.co/T5Eo0b6jdg -> IT… [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Gravelet-Blondin 13-691Issue: (1) Whether it is – or should be – clearly established that police officers per se violate the United States Constitution when they use nontrivial force in the context of passive resistance, regardless of the surrounding circumstances; and (2) whether the Ninth Circuit’s unique treatment of tasers – “intermediate force as a matter of law,” which “must” be justified by the government interest involved … [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Liability may attach if the officer is adjudged in hindsight to have acted outside the scope of his or her delegated authority or to have failed to act on a matter that was not (sic) within his or her expected areas of responsibility.[8] More recently, five decisions by federal district courts in California ruled that the business judgment rule applies only to independent directors, not officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
Liability may attach if the officer is adjudged in hindsight to have acted outside the scope of his or her delegated authority or to have failed to act on a matter that was not (sic) within his or her expected areas of responsibility.[8] More recently, five decisions by federal district courts in California ruled that the business judgment rule applies only to independent directors, not officers. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
And the searing, silent sorrow of the dead man's mother's eyes haunted me. [read post]
