Search for: "Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog" Results 241 - 260 of 1,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2017, 5:27 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
[and] asks us to hold as a matter of law that damages authorized by the 1991 amendments to the Civil Rights Act can only be recovered in individual suits. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:57 pm by Michael Ginsborg
As I have blogged before, I get worried when the lawyers on “our” side pursue litigation strategies borrowed from the opponents of other civil rights movements, and which are deeply non-progressive in nature. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:43 am
Prugh, Holliday, and Karatinos  and it is troubling-- far more so than the Second Circuit opinion I blogged about earlier. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:54 pm by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, and sex. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:14 pm
Not wanting to go unbloggily overlong, I said I'd do a second post parsing the details of Turley's blog post criticizing me for criticizing his proposal to enlarge the Supreme Court to 19 Justices. [read post]
24 May 2021, 4:40 am by Eric B. Meyer
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals explained: The ADEA limitations scheme creates a hard start and stop for civil actions. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:06 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Factual Background The EEOC brought suit against CRST alleging that the company subjected Monika Starke and a class of similarly-situated female employees to a hostile work environment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:33 am by Orin Kerr
Here’s the Second Circuit’s summary of the law in In re Weiss, 703 F.2d 653 (2d. [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am by Holly Brezee
” Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 145, cmt. e (1971). [3] Schmidt v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm by Holly Brezee
” Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 145, cmt. e (1971). [3] Schmidt v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff On June 14, 2019 in Regents of the University of Minnesota v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 4:57 am by Ivana Kunda
This interesting case comment has been kindly provided to the blog by Nicolás Zambrana-Tévar , LLM, PhD, KIMEP University The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has found in favor of Spain as defendant in a property case spanning several decades. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:40 am by Maureen Johnston
Jerejian 13-827Issue: (1) Whether the Second Amendment secures a right to carry handguns outside the home for self-defense; and (2) whether state officials violate the Second Amendment by requiring that individuals wishing to exercise their right to carry a handgun for self-defense first prove a “justifiable need” for doing so. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
Mercy Health System of Kansas, Inc. 13-1118Issue: Whether Section 704(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits retaliation against a worker because of the worker’s statements: (1) only when the statements are made to the worker’s own employer or to federal or state anti-discrimination agencies (the rule in the Tenth and Fourth Circuits), or (2) also when the worker’s statements are made to any other person (the rule in the First,… [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 3:35 pm
In September, Judge Lynch was confirmed to the Second Circuit by a vote of 94-3. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm by David Zaring
It was too weird for the the Second Circuit, which just ruled against the SEC and Judge Rakoff. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission 19-392Issues: (1) Whether the constitutional right to counsel of choice extends to cases in which a criminal defendant’s assets are frozen as part of a parallel civil enforcement action; and (2) whether the failure to return untainted personal property to a defendant violates the constitutional guarantee of due process. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am by Eric
By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa [Eric's note: this is a long blog post from my colleague Tyler. [read post]