Search for: "Self v. Laws" Results 241 - 260 of 16,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2010, 12:39 am by INFORRM
In respect of the Hildebrand rules the Court concluded as follows: “We agree with Ward LJ that the so-called Hildebrand rules cannot in law be justified on any of the bases suggested, whether on the basis of lawful excuse, self-help or public interest, or, indeed, we would add, on any other basis. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:51 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Public Officers Law §36 provides for the removal of an individual from public office for self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral turpitude, intentional wrongdoing or violation of a public trustLibordi v Isaman, 2015 NY Slip Op 08552, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentFrancis Libordi initiated an action in the Appellate Division, 4th Department, pursuant §36 of the Public Officers Law in an effort to have Kenneth Isaman, a public… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
“If the State agrees with petitioner that damages liability for violations of the self-care provision is neces­sary to combat discrimination against women, the State may waive its immunity or create a parallel state law cause of action,” Justice Kennedy wrote. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:39 am by Andrew Frisch
EEOC, 493 U.S. 182, 110 S .Ct. 577, 107 L.Ed.2d 571 (1990), which declined to recognize a common law privilege against disclosure of confidential peer review materials.Granberry v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Harvard International Law Journal
by Harvard International Law Journal [Carlos Vázquez, Professor of Law, Georgetown Law Center responds to David Sloss, Executing Foster v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 11:28 am
Treaties as Law of the Land: The Supremacy Clause and Presumption of Self-Execution, a new article by Carlos Vázquez and to be published in the Harvard Law Review, has just been posted to SSRN. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:30 am by John-Paul Boyd
The Rights and Responsibilities of Self-Represented Parties in Arbitration You are a “self-represented party” if you are involved in an arbitration and are not represented by a lawyer. [read post]