Search for: "Smith v. Connor"
Results 241 - 260
of 289
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
Smith decision (a decision that I myself support, though I also support the existence of jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction Religious Freedom Restoration Act statutes). [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Downward Modification of Child Support Based on a Loss of Employment Due to Injury Granted Where Father Demonstrated Injuries Severely Limited His Ability to Resume His Veterinary Practice In Smith v Smith, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 88100 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.) pursuant to a 2002 judgment of divorce, defendant (mother) was awarded sole custody of the parties' four children. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Evidently, the intellectual property bar cares a great deal about whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor’s sale of an invention to a third party who is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for purposes of determining the patentability of the invention. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
Writing for Carroll O'Connor, who had #1 parking spot. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:44 pm
Recall that in Smith, Justice O’Connor disagreed with the majority’s rejection of constitutional exemptions generally, but held that the Oregon peyote ban was nonetheless the least restrictive means of serving a compelling interest in fighting drug abuse. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am
The blogosphere reported yesterday that Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, has condemned the ruling as the Court’s most partisan since 2000’s Bush v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
To register, please send a message with your name, affiliation, and full contact information to: Jeff Smith, Coordinator, Henry G. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:37 am
From the perspective of a police officer, as the law requires the shooting be considered under Graham v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:54 pm
Justice Kagan with opinion in Gundy v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
Here is the complaint: Babbitt v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
• Most consumers know little about food irradiation (American Meat Institute, 1993; Bruhn, 2001) • A survey conducted at FoodNet sites in 1998-1999, indicated that the primary reason consumers would not buy irradiated foods (meat, poultry) was due to insufficient information about the risks and benefits; the survey also showed 50% of those asked were willing to buy irradiated meat and poultry and among those, 25% were willing to pay a premium price (Frenzen et al, 2000) •… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
So much is clear: we no longer see the types of discriminatory acts that gave rise to the Act, and Bull Connor is indeed dead. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:17 am
” Sotomayor pointed to the language of U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 10:01 pm
Smith (1911). [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Taylor v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Travis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:56 am
JDB v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
Smith National Library for the Study of George Washington at Mount Vernon. [read post]
