Search for: "Smith v. Martin"
Results 241 - 260
of 580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 12:27 pm
” Coolidge v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
Pearcy, Historian, Office of History, USACEComment: Joe Manous, Program Manager, Institute for Water Resources (IWR), USACEData Collection and Documentation in the DigitalChair, Joshua Botts, Office of the Historian, Department of StateMichael Lawson, Morgan Angel & Associates, “Close Attention to Detail: The Challenge of Collecting, Imaging and Interpreting Historical Documents in the Contemporary Digital World of Litigation”Dana John Stefanelli, Smith Library, Mount… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
Adell, Razing the Forest to Kill a Tree: EEOC V. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Promoting public safety is a "well-established goal" (Heller II, 698 F Supp 2d at 191; see also Schall v Martin, 467 US 253, 264 [1984] ["The legitimate and compelling state interest' in protecting the community from crime cannot be doubted. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
Clark v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:13 pm
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 2015 U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
However, several factors combine to tilt him away from taking this approach alone: these include (i) the sheer complexity of the mechanisms for operating the proposed system which will be as hard to amend and fine-tune as it has been to establish in the first place, (ii) its plainly divisive nature, (iii) the absurdly convoluted structure for litigating unitary patents and matters relating to them, (iv) the fact that the realities relating to the satisfactory governance of the European Patent Office… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:22 pm
The latest case is Viola Coppela v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:28 am
Martin's UR decision invalid. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
***** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* Laura Smith-Hewitt… is categorically is an examiner -- some readers should get over it. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 11:03 am
Related Issues: NSA SpyingPATRIOT ActRelated Cases: Smith v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:25 am
In Kim v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
Duke Power Company, per that racial radical Warren Burger, found a disparate-impact cause of action under Title VII and, more recently in Smith v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 5:33 am
My HMO series with David looks at the Management Regulations, and the case of Spencer v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
Latimer v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
