Search for: "State v. York" Results 241 - 260 of 35,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
New York State's Human Rights Law requires the compliant to be filed with the State Division of Human Rights within one year of the most recent act of the unlawful discrimination alleged2017 NY Slip Op 06968, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Petitioner in this action, a long-term, at-will employee of the Town, was advised that his employment would be terminated as part of the Town's transitioning to the incoming administration of a newly elected Town… [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 9:44 am by Peter Howard Tilem
A New York State Supreme Court Justice ruled last week that New York’s Extreme Risk Protection Order laws, often called Red Flag laws are unconstitutional and declined to issue an Extreme Risk Protection Order (ERPO). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:17 am
” * Article V,  §2 of the State's Constitution provides that "There shall be not more than twenty civil departments in the state government, including those referred to in this constitution. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
As a result of the recent grant received by the State of New York for the improvement of services to victims of traumatic brain injury, a new position has been created fwith the New York State Department of Health for the administration of this grant. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Workplace Prof
A few weeks ago, the New York Court of Appeals became the first State supreme court to expressly import Ricci v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:04 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Zervos v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:05 pm by constitutional lawblogger
An appellate division court in New York issued its opinion today in Matter of Kaur v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:34 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in Palin v. [read post]