Search for: "State v. Amaral" Results 241 - 260 of 641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
[Josh Blackman] Oral Arguments in Trump v. Anderson Part I: Justice Gorsuch Gets "Officers of the United States"
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am by Josh Blackman
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Professor Obama on sexuality, gender and health
31 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
  This was seven years prior to Lawrence v. [read post]
Feminist Law Professors - http://feministlawprofessors.com
Some “Teachable” First Amendment Moments in the Supreme Court’s Oral Argument About Confederate Flags on Texas License Plates
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Severability in Larger Constitutional Context: Part Five in our Series on the California v. Texas Challenge to the Affordable Care Act
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar, Evan Caminker and Jason Mazzone
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Military court finds Facebook messages authenticated
22 Nov 2011, 8:15 pm by Jeffrey Brown
The United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals held in United States v. [read post]
Cybercrime Review - http://www.cybercrimereview.com/
Email, Business Records and Authentication
31 Jan 2011, 6:25 am by Susan Brenner
Amaral, supra (quoting Commonwealth v. [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
Are “Advisory” Measures” (Like Proposition 49) Permitted on the California Ballot?
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Two Constitutional Lessons Worth Remembering: Norms Are Different From Legal Rules; And Improper Intent Matters But Is Hard To Establish
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States and Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Looking Beyond Next Week’s California Gubernatorial Recall Election: The Case for Legislative Reform Rather Than Judicial Intervention
9 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(We all remember how a tight timeline affected the quality of judicial work product in complicated election matters in Bush v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Replacing Justice Kennedy: Why Roe Won’t Be (Formally) Overruled, Same-Sex Marriage Rights Won’t Be Undone, and Affirmative Action Won’t Be Terminated, but Electoral Reform Could Suffer Greatly
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And, most famously, in Obergefell v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
The Year in Constitutional Review: Our Top 5 Constitutional Developments of 2014 (And None of Them Is a Supreme Court Decision!)
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Alan E. Brownstein
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
What a California Proposal to Authorize the Killing of Gays Says About the Initiative Process and the First Amendment
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Alan E. Brownstein
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Part 8 Reflections on Völkerrechtsblog Online Symposium: "Framing Business & Human Rights?": Flávia do Amaral Vieira, 'Resisting Corporate Capture'
27 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
It is  hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - https://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
If the Challengers Prevail on the Merits of the ACA California v. Texas Case, What is the Appropriate Remedy and What Effect Should the Ruling Have on the Entirety of the ACA? Part Four in a Series
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar, Evan Caminker and Jason Mazzone
Assume that in California v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
If Originalism Is Going to Be Displaced, Critics Must Do Better than Dean Chemerinsky Seems to Be Doing
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Assessing the Challenge to Maine’s Ranked-Choice Voting System for Congressional Elections
29 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
Because many Nader voters would have voted for Gore had Nader not been in the race, and the pickup of these Nader voters would have given Gore more states. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
With the End of Its 2023-24 Term in Sight, the Supreme Court Has Not Been Particularly Partisan or Aggressive This Year, Even as it Has Had No Choice but to Take Certain High-Profile Cases (In Part Because of an Out-of-step Lower Court, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)
23 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
In Trump v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Remaining Faithful to Free Speech and Academic Freedom
14 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the Supreme Court observed in the context of high school students in Tinker v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Continuing The Conversation Over the Constitutionality of California’s Recall Mechanism: Why We Are More Convinced Than Ever Before That Equal Protection Challenges to It Lack Merit
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Evan Caminker
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Another Front in the Same-Sex Equality Campaign: Jury Service, Peremptory Challenges, and the Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott Laboratories Case Pending in the Ninth Circuit
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  That is why the Supreme Court’s failure to make clear the standard of review it was applying in United States v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/