Search for: "State v. Carr" Results 241 - 260 of 707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 10:15 am by Lyle Denniston
United States — proof needed to convict a public official for criminal extortion under the Hobbs Act DirecTV v. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 4:54 am by Tobias Thienel
Carr had insisted that the doctrine went to justiciability and not to jurisdiction (at 198-204), the lower court in Schneider v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 8:42 am
This morning, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Conversant Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L v Huawei Technologies Co. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 3:44 am
United States - concerning the Armed Career Criminal Act and state convictions for batteryBloate v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:53 am
Chugai Pharmaceutical v UCB [2017] EWHC 1216 (Pat) is a decision of Mr Justice Henry Carr (correctly named in full to avoid any possible confusion with Mrs Justice (Sue) Carr), which is given in admirably clear terms despite its complex subject matter. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:13 am by CMS
In the High Court, Mr Justice Carr found in favour of Kymab and ruled that the Regeneron patents were insufficient. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
.* See, for example, Matter of Cravatta v New York State Dept. of Transp., 77 AD3d 1399; Matter of Carr v New York State Dept. of Transp., 70 AD3d 1110.** An applicant for unemployment insurance benefits who has left his or her position “without good cause” is typically held ineligible for such benefits. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 6:32 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As Judge Carr stated in a footnote, “Most simply put, my disagreement with the majority’s analysis and result arises from my different reading, as explained in this dissent of the record. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 5:15 am by Erin Miller
– In United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 5:55 am by Joel A. Webber
Changing that requires a lot of resources and rare, unflinching leadership … Someone like @CarrNext [Jeff Carr referenced above] is the missing link. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]