Search for: "State v. Clark"
Results 241 - 260
of 3,520
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 7:53 am
Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2006, 6:30 am
Azbell, Case no. 2005-17885th District Court ofAppeals (Richland County)State v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 1:00 pm
State officials are absolutely immune for these sorts of executive, prosecutorial decisions. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:21 am
State Farm. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 4:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Clarke Rule. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm
Clarke Rule. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am
Starting this morning in the Supreme Court is the appeal of Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Walker, L Kerr, L Clarke, L Dyson). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:51 pm
Dan Tench, Emma Boffey, Graeme MacLeod and Jo Clark are solicitors at CMS This post originally appeared on the CMS Law-Now website and is reproduced with permission and thanks [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:45 am
Clarke v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 2:00 am
In 2012, I blogged on the reported Clark v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm
Michael’s article reads: The recent Supreme Court of Florida decision in Sebo v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm
Michael’s article reads: The recent Supreme Court of Florida decision in Sebo v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:53 pm
In Ohio v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 2:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice were heard on 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:00 am
In regards to the proportionality argument, Lord Clarke stated that, in this case, the absence of a specified time limit for detention does not infringe the principles in R v Governor of Durham Prison, Ex P Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 1:21 pm
In Clark v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 4:18 pm
Prior to Hamilton v. [read post]
