Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 241 - 260
of 26,729
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2024, 10:55 am
The Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am
The Court’s precedent indicates that those include the power to pardon, the power to remove executive officers he has appointed, and the power to recognize foreign countries. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 5:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:14 pm
The size of the Supreme Court did increase from 6 justices at the founding, to 7 and then 9, before 1861, as the population and number of states in the union increased exponentially. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 5:48 pm
Save Jobs USA v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 1:38 pm
The lawsuit was largely dismissed in Raymond v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 11:51 am
In June 2024, after an oral hearing in Bulone v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’ use of… [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:00 am
Consulate or Embassy in their home country. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Two months earlier, the French counsel in Charleston, Jean-Baptiste Perry, had sent a letter to the French Minister of Marine which described the “anguish” of South Carolina planters over the prospect that after 1808 the United States might not only “prohibit the importation of negroes,” but also “emancipate those born in this country after that time” (27 DHRC 41). [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:02 am
And on the international stage, they have adopted counterterrorism rhetoric to mobilize support or deflect criticism – accusing other States of making statements “in support of terrorism,” urging supporters of the pending ICJ case (South Africa v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
" Eventually, in SFFA v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 2:41 am
Simply put, the so-called “presumptive reciprocity” means that, unless proven otherwise, reciprocity is presumed to exist between the requested State and the State of origin, to the extent permitted by domestic law of the requested State.[3] Here, “proven otherwise” refers to any existing case where the judgments from the requested State have been refused enforcement in the State of origin on the ground of the lack of reciprocity. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 11:22 am
The US Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear a case to decide the legality of a state ban on gender-affirming care for minors, which will have a significant impact on youth transgender health rights across the country. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
The Roe decision in 1973 enshrined a right to abortion across the country, striking down many state-level abortion laws at the time. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 2:30 pm
In the present case, Dada v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
Considered “the flyover country of constitutional history,” (10) events during this period have often been neglected and misunderstood, overshadowed by what preceded and followed them.[1] Instead, LaCroix’s book demonstrates the important and creative developments in constitutional thought, argument and practice during the period of the Interbellum Constitution. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 11:33 am
Domestic Reporting Entities Entity Type Reporting Entity (unless exempted) LLC Yes SMLLC Yes General Partnership No Sole Proprietorship Not unless corporation or LLC Limited Partnership Yes S Corporation Yes C Corporation Yes Trust Not unless required to file with Secretary of State, but trustees or beneficiaries may be beneficial owners of other reporting entities Foreign reporting companies are corporations, LLCs, or other entities formed under the law… [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 10:14 am
He focused on the applicable substantive law in BHR suits brought in developed countries (usually the home state of the defendant corporation) for injuries suffered in developing countries (the host state). [read post]
