Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 241 - 260 of 4,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2009, 12:24 pm
III:   Division II State v. [read post]
On Monday, October 24, the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) confirmed that it did not appeal the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Trafigura Trading LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:33 am by Florian Mueller
But the particular way in which Qualcomm's reply brief makes that point is misleading:"See United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 2:46 pm
Where it says, quite clearly, "COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am by Kelly Goles
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (1981-1999), Johnson presided over critical civil rights cases of the 1950s and 1960s such as Browder v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am by Jon Gelman
P. 9.330(d)(2).About 60 years ago, writing for the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
Because pursuant to Rule 8.1(h), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure (ARCAP), ‘[e]xpedited election appeals involving recalls … shall be filed in the Court of Appeals’ rather than this Court, IT IS ORDERED transferring this matter to the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:02 pm by The Complex Litigator
 The Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) held, in Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
In Wholesale Electricity Antitrust Cases I & II, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Feb. 26, 2007), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One), held that the Federal Power Act and implementing regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission preempted the plaintiffs' UCL and Cartwright Act claims. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
An appeal may be taken to the court of appeals as of right: “1. from an order of the appellate division which finally determines an action where there is directly involved the construction of the constitution of the state or of the United States .... [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The “Rule of Necessity” permits a tribunal, the members of which could be affected by the decision, to decide a case or controversyPines, et. al. v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 00335, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn deciding an action initiated by Emily Pines and other judges, Supreme Court that held that “the compensation of judges and justices of the Unified Court System of the State of New York was duly… [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
 Here's what the Court of Appeal says about it:"In Property Reserve v. [read post]