Search for: "State v. D. S."
Results 241 - 260
of 43,225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2021, 6:14 pm
EMW Women's Surgical Ctr., P.S.C. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:49 am
AB and others v Ministry of Defence [2009] EWHC 1225 (QB); [2009] WLR (D) 174 “In relation to a group action the issue as to when a claimant had "knowledge" for the purposes of ss 12 and 14 of the Limitation Act 1980 was primarily one of fact The state of the claimant's belief was to [...] [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
Reddick v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 11:55 am
After State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
Id.As to the lawDetermining whether personal jurisdiction over anout-of-state defendant is proper entails a two-part inquiry.Elecs. for Imaging, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:25 am
Regina (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice (JUSTICE and another intervening); In re MacDermott’s and McCartney’s Applications for Judicial Review (JUSTICE intervening) [2011] UKSC 18; [2011] WLR (D) 155 “A miscarriage of justice, within the meaning of section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, occurred where a new fact so undermined the evidence against the defendant that no conviction could possibly be based upon it. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 8:10 am
In Cisneros v Lopez, 2016 WL 7428197 (D. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 7:23 am
(stating that an employee's claim failed because the employer had presented evidence that the plaintiff was terminated in a reorganization and the employee failed to offer evidence to "dispute the company's contention that Yashenko's position was eliminated in a legitimate reorganization"). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:21 am
SerVaas Inc v Rafidain Bank: [2012] UKSC 40; [2012] WLR (D) 257 “Whether property was ‘for the time being in use or intended for use for commercial purposes’ within the meaning of section 13(4) of the State Immunity Act 1978 did not depend on the property’s origin but on the use to which the state had chosen to put it.” WLR Daily, 17th August 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 12:41 pm
United States, Docket No. 16-1371, J. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 3:54 am
Bean's Complaint states that McDougal infringed upon his copyrights in the photograph in violation of 17 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
In this set of short wins, the one that I’d like to call attention to is United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:44 pm
Sentencing Commission, in a report issued in October 2011, is the Appellant’s mandatory 40 year sentence, without parole— under Maryland Code Ann., Criminal Law Article 5-608(d) (i.e., the fourth time offender rule”)—illegal, as being “excessively severe? [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:26 am
The Supreme Court today released its decision in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:58 am
Symeou v Public Prosecutor's Office at the Court of Appeals, Patras, Greece [2009] EWHC 897 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 146 “The jurisdiction to order a person's discharge if his extradition would constitute an abuse of process did not extend to consideration of misconduct or bad faith by the police of the requesting state in the investigation [...] [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
Nat'l Football League Players Association, Inc. et al.United States District Court for D. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
Apr. 18, 2008), aff’d in part, vacated and remanded in part, 633 F. 3d 1297 (11th Cir. 2011). [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:01 am
” United States v. [read post]
