Search for: "State v. Duty" Results 241 - 260 of 31,926
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In addition, a Satisfaction of Judgment was filed on February 24,2021 stating that the Judgment was paid in full and the sum of $0.00 remains unpaid (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
In their Complaint, two minority shareholders of Dial, suing derivatively on behalf of the company, named seven of Dial’s board members and officers as defendants alleging claims for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Dissolution (no particular statute specified), Accounting, Declaratory Judgment, Conversion, Unjust Enrichment, Constructive Trust, and Injunction. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am by Giles Peaker
This led to Ms B seeing new solicitors, who in May 2023 wrote to WF stating that the housing duty had not been ended. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am by Dennis Crouch
The Supreme Court is currently considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
Intrusion upon seclusion claim: The court referred to Jones v Tsige and stated that the tort required intentional intrusion upon the seclusion of another of his private affairs. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Serbia, all 153 State parties to the Genocide Convention are under the obligation to halt and prevent the genocide and a corresponding duty act. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
As stated by the tribunal in this case, “clear, convincing and cogent evidence is required to satisfy the balance of probabilities test”. [read post]